Skip to content
Clawdemy

References: AI won't replace you. But it will expose you.

Going deeper

Section titled “Going deeper”

A short list, chosen for durability. Every link here resolves at publish time and points to an author who is still writing.

  • One Useful Thing by Ethan Mollick (Wharton). The clearest public articulation of the “AI as co-intelligence” framing, written for non-technical professionals. Start with his posts on working with AI rather than the generic AI coverage elsewhere on the web. If you read one outside-the-lesson source after this, make it Mollick.

  • fast.ai. Jeremy Howard and Rachel Thomas built their teaching philosophy around showing the working result first and peeling back theory only when the reader is ready for it. Clawdemy borrows that structure directly. Their “Practical Deep Learning” course is technical, but the approach to adult learning is why this lesson opens with Maria and not with a definition.

Adjacent topics

Section titled “Adjacent topics”

Lessons we’re building next on Clawdemy. These aren’t linked yet because they aren’t published yet.

  • Your first hour with Clawless. The audit you just did becomes something you run against a real task in Clawless. Coming in lesson 2.
  • Build AI tools without coding. Once you know what to delegate, this is where you build your own small assistants to do it. Coming in lesson 3.

Original sources

Section titled “Original sources”

Primary sources cited in the lesson body.

  • “U.S. Leadership in AI with Jensen Huang and Congressman Ro Khanna”, Stanford Graduate School of Business, April 9, 2026. Moderated by General H.R. McMaster (former National Security Advisor) alongside GSB Dean Sarah A. Soule. The two Huang quotes in the lesson body (“you’ll lose your job to somebody who uses AI” and “your job, the purpose of your job, and the tasks that you do in your job are related but not the same”) come from this conversation. Watch the full discussion if you want the wider context: regulation, talent policy, and the case Huang and Khanna make for keeping AI development in the U.S.

Community discussion

Section titled “Community discussion”

None selected for this lesson. The internet’s take on “will AI replace my job” is noisy, evergreen-in-the-worst-way, and rarely durable. If we find a canonical thread worth linking, it’ll be added on the next quarterly review.