Skip to content

References: The four-paradigm landscape and where modern systems sit

  • Stanford CS236, Deep Generative Models, capstone synthesis material (Stefano Ermon). The course’s broader framing across lectures, used here as the synthesis reference. Course page: deepgenerativemodels.github.io.
  • Berkeley CS294-158 Sp24, Deep Unsupervised Learning, capstone material (Pieter Abbeel, Wilson Yan, Kevin Frans, Philipp Wu). Secondary framing for the same synthesis material with emphasis on the deep-unsupervised-learning side. Course page: sites.google.com/view/berkeley-cs294-158-sp24/.

Foundational papers per paradigm (the math each paradigm rests on)

Section titled “Foundational papers per paradigm (the math each paradigm rests on)”

Canonical modern systems referenced in the capstone

Section titled “Canonical modern systems referenced in the capstone”
  • Each major autoregressive language model release in the last few years (the GPT family, the Llama family, the Mistral family, the Claude family, the Gemini family) is a paradigm-1 system at scale. Read each release’s technical report for the specific architectural and training choices; the paradigm placement does not change.

Latent diffusion (the dominant text-to-image paradigm)

Section titled “Latent diffusion (the dominant text-to-image paradigm)”

What this track did NOT cover (pointers to other expertise)

Section titled “What this track did NOT cover (pointers to other expertise)”
  • Systems engineering of training large generative models. Distributed training frameworks, hardware-aware optimization, training-data pipelines, debugging at scale. These topics belong in an MLOps or systems-engineering track and require expertise this lesson does not develop.
  • Policy, governance, and societal questions around generative AI. The §6 watch-territory framing on lessons 7, 12, 13, and 14 named six categories of policy questions (use-case appropriateness, provenance and watermarking, sector-specific deployment, training-data IP and licensing, likeness and consent, prompt-injection content risks). Each requires expertise in its forum.
  • Frontier research directions. New objectives, new architectures, new sampling procedures appear continuously. The four-paradigm framework gives you the language to read them; the frontier itself moves faster than any single course can keep up with.

The map you opened the track with is the map you close the track with. The math underneath has been filled in. The references above are the literature this map reads.

Source curriculum (structural mirror, cited as further study):
• Stanford CS236: Deep Generative Models (Stefano Ermon)
Course page: https://deepgenerativemodels.github.io/
Clawdemy's lessons are original prose that follows the pedagogical arc of this
source. We do not reproduce or transcribe it; we cite it as a recommended
companion. All rights to the original material remain with its authors.