Skip to content

References: Many agents working together: multi-agent systems

Source curriculum (structural mirror, cited as further study):
• Microsoft, "Multi-agent design patterns" (AI Agents for Beginners, Lesson 08)
Author: Microsoft Cloud Advocates
Lesson page: https://github.com/microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners/tree/main/08-multi-agent
License: MIT
• Berkeley CS294/194-196, "Compound AI Systems & the DSPy Framework" (Lecture 5)
Speaker: Omar Khattab (Databricks)
Course page: https://rdi.berkeley.edu/llm-agents/f24
Video: https://www.youtube.com/live/JEMYuzrKLUw
License: YouTube standard (link-out only)
Clawdemy's lessons are original prose that follows the pedagogical arc of these
sources. We do not reproduce or transcribe them; we cite them as recommended
companions. All rights to the original materials remain with their authors.
Note: Microsoft Lesson 08 presents multi-agent advantages without the
coordination-cost downsides. This lesson supplies that counterweight
deliberately, for an honest fit-not-ranking treatment.

A short, durable list.

Where this leads inside this track.

  • Agents that self-check: metacognition. The next lesson. A way to make a single agent more reliable without adding a second one: a reflection step where the agent checks its own work before committing.
  • Planning: breaking a goal into steps. The previous lesson. A plan’s sub-tasks are what a multi-agent system divides among specialists, so planning and multi-agent design are two halves of the same decomposition question.
  • The tool-use design pattern in depth. Earlier in the track. The reason specialization helps: an agent with a small, well-described toolbox picks more reliably than one with too many tools, which is the system-level case for splitting into specialists.